1. Crypto Clash: SEC Flags Titan Capital Over Deceptive Claims
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has levelled charges against Titan Global Capital Management for advertising and compliance breaches.
The New York-based fintech investment manager had allegedly posted deceptive statements on its website regarding "hypothetical performance," contrary to the SEC's updated marketing rule from December 2020.
Furthermore, despite Titan's claim of a potential 2,700% annual return for its Titan Crypto product, the SEC identified a lack of proper employee trading practices in the company until October 2022 and unclear statements about cryptocurrency asset custody and other policies.
In response, Titan has agreed to a cease-and-desist order, censure, and penalties, including a $850,000 fine to compensate impacted clients and disgorging $192,454 of improperly acquired gains plus interest.
OPINION: The SEC's action against Titan underscores the urgency of ensuring transparency and adherence to regulatory guidelines, especially in the rapidly-evolving crypto sector.
==
2. Cuban and NFT Titans Challenge OpenSea's Royalty Rethink
Prominent figures in the NFT world, such as billionaire Mark Cuban and Yuga Labs, the force behind the Bored Ape Yacht Club, have voiced their disapproval of OpenSea's decision to cease enforcing creator royalties.
Cuban, not just an observer but an investor in OpenSea, aired his concerns on Twitter, suggesting the decision could damage trust in the platform and negatively impact the broader industry.
The decision by OpenSea, the most significant NFT marketplace still adhering to the royalty system, appears to be a reaction to competing marketplaces that have cut or dropped such fees.
This move by OpenSea's CEO, Devin Finzer, faced backlash, with notable NFT creators like Yuga Labs intending to end their platform compatibility with OpenSea by 2024.
OPINION: OpenSea's move to discontinue enforcing creator royalties, especially given its market dominance, underscores a pivotal moment in the NFT industry. If such a significant platform can abandon the principle of ensuring creators receive their due, it potentially sets a precedent for others to follow.
This incident might signal the need for clearer, standardized regulations in the NFT space to ensure that as the industry evolves, creators' rights and contributions remain protected and valued.
==
3. DeFi Platforms Exactly and Harbor Hit by Heists, Prompting Security Alarms
Decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms Exactly and Harbor were hit by separate cyber-attacks.
Exactly Protocol, a cryptocurrency lending service, faced a theft of approximately 4,323.6 Ether (ETH) - nearly $7.3 million.
Though initial claims put the loss around $12 million, this number was later revised. The cybercriminals manipulated the DebtManager contract, dodging safeguards and triggering a malicious deposit function.
In response, Exactly Protocol reported the incident to the police and seeks to negotiate with the perpetrators for asset recovery.
Concurrently, Harbor, an interchain stablecoin platform, experienced a breach impacting its stable-mint and various vaults holding stOSMO, LUNA, and WMATIC.
The exact amount of the theft remains undetermined, with Harbor in the process of tracking the pilfered funds and evaluating the total damages.
It's worth noting that several DeFi platforms have previously also been compromised, with Curve Finance, Earn.Finance, and Zunami Protocol incurring significant losses due to vulnerabilities.
OPINION: As innovative and promising as the DeFi ecosystem is, it remains plagued by security risks that can undermine trust and thwart its broader adoption.
Regulatory oversight seems inevitable and perhaps necessary. By implementing standardized security measures and routinely auditing platforms, the industry can hope to diminish such incidents. Striking a balance between innovation and security will be crucial for the long-term viability of DeFi.
To learn more about Blockchain Law, join the Executive Program in Blockchain Law.